Which practice helps minimize supervision gaps during transitions?

Escorting athletes to another coach or instructor during transitions is an effective practice for minimizing supervision gaps, as it ensures that athletes are continually observed and supported throughout the change. This approach fosters a structured environment, where individuals are guided from one setting to another, preventing instances where an athlete may be left unattended or unsure of their next steps.

Maintaining consistent oversight during transitions is crucial for safety and can help reduce the likelihood of accidents or mishaps that may arise from moments of uncertainty or lack of direction. By physically accompanying athletes during these transitions, coaches can provide instant assistance, address any questions or concerns, and reinforce safety protocols, thus ensuring a seamless and secure experience for everyone involved.

Other practices, while they may have their own merits, do not effectively address the potential risks associated with supervision lapses. Allowing athletes to transfer without assistance or instructing them to switch on their own can lead to confusion and a lack of guidance, potentially increasing the risks during transitions. Having multiple coaches on duty may enhance overall supervision, but it does not specifically target the immediate moments when athletes are moving between activities.